Value Evalution is Muti-dimensional(价值评估是多维的)

There are two-person, “A” and “B”. A looks very handsome or very beautiful, and B looks deformed. Which one do you like? Possibly, your answer is “A”.You may like A better.

If I tell you that A did something bad to his(her)colleagues many years ago. If you just knew the truth. What’s your new answer? Yes, you may choose B. You may think B is a good person though B looks deformed. But if I tell you the real reason A did bad things is just want to help you when you were in a trouble; A just want to get more money to help you, how do you think about A? Right! You may like A best!

Let’s go on. If there are a lot of diamonds and a cellphone, which one is more valuable? Yes, your answer may be the former. But if you get lost in a forest, you’re in trouble now, do you still think diamonds are more valuable than a cellphone? Certainly, you may choose the latter.

Why does the answer always change? The truth is the existence of “ME”. Because the value’s judgment is muti-dimensional, and we have different answers when we are at different times, different places, different occasions, etc.

We often like to be self-centered, to evaluate everything around us. Do you think so?

 

简体中文:

这儿,有两个人:“A”和“B”。A看上去很英俊或是很漂亮,而B看上去很丑。你会喜欢哪个?答案可能是“A”。你可能更喜欢A。

如果我告诉你,多年前A对他(她)的同事做过一些坏事。如果你现在才知道真相。你的新答案是什么?是的,你可能选择B。虽然B看起来很丑,但你可能认为B是一个好人。但是,如果我告诉你A做坏事的真正原因只是想在你遇到麻烦时帮你一把; A只是想获得更多的钱来帮你,你又觉得A怎么样呢?不错!你可能更喜欢A!

咱们继续。如果有很多钻石和一部手机,哪个更有价值?是的,你的答案可能是前者。但是,如果你现在在森林中走失了,你陷入麻烦之中了,你是否仍然认为钻石比手机更有价值呢?当然,你可能选择后者。

为什么答案总是变化?我想是因为“我”的存在。因为价值的判断是多维的,所以当我们在不同时间、不同地点、不同场合等时,我们会有不同的答案。

我们经常喜欢以自我为中心,去评估我们周围一切事物的价值。你也是这样想的吗?